Archive for the ‘Who’s Testing’ category

Who Else Does the Same Mistakes as Search Engine Land?

January 20th, 2010

Here’s a good sample of a poor concept of a registration page (I did not expect searchengineland.com to do such mistakes):

search engine land mistakes on the register page

Huge Mistakes on Search Engine Land Registration Page

I will point the major problems only:

1. primary action (register button) is below the fold

2. the registration button doesn’t look like a button at all

3. secondary actions have more prominence than the desired purpose of this page (to register and create an account)

Funny thing, when I took the screenshot, the captcha was the bounces :)

To address the issues above you need to:

1. always have the main call to action above the fold

2. CTA buttons should look like buttons

3. identify the primary purpose of each page and make it easy for visitors to reach that goal. Secondary goals should not overwhelm the primary purpose

Rate this Post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #30 – www.vacationtimesharerentals.com

January 18th, 2010

This is an MVT test from www.vacationtimesharerentals.com:

vacationtimesharerentals original

Vacation Time Share Rentals - Original

vacationtimesharerentals variation 1

Vacation Time Share Rentals - Variation 1

Rate this test!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Trust Seals Collection and How to Use Them to Increase Conversion Rates

January 14th, 2010


Trust seals is the generic phrase used to depict those images (see collection at the bottom of the article) which online businesses use on their websites to address Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUDs).

Seals can be categorized into privacy seals, business validity seals, PCI compliancy seals, hacksafe seals and other types. It may be useful to know that there are seals which are applicable to certain industries only (like the Pharmacy Checker for Canadian pharmacies) and seals which can be used on most of the websites (business verification seals).

Smart online marketers use seals on websites to transfer trust from a well-know company (i.e. Verisign) to visitors and to make them feel comfortable about their privacy, confidentiality or other concerns. In our terms, we use them to increase the conversion rate of websites.

Do they really have an effect on conversion rate? Yes, they do, but each seal will perform different, simply because your audience is different than the other website. While I do recommend using some of the seals, namely those which anyone will recognize, I advocate for multivariate testing. Most likely, if used correctly the impact on conversion rate should be either positive or neutral. If improperly used (clicking is not working, fake seal, etc) your conversion rate could suffer.

Having 20 trust seals on each page of your website will hurt. Having none, may hurt also. For site wide use, you should display 2 or 3 of them, which are important and recognized by  your audience. However, if you’re would like flex you muscles with 10 or more (which I don’t advise), I would recommend creating a dedicated page on your site, where you can lay all of them.

Here are some ideas when it comes to using and testing trust seals:

  • start testing with 2 or 3 seals: one wide known (i.e. McAfee) and your industry-specific seals
  • always display the seal above the fold; if your copy is way longer, repeat it near your call to actions
  • test overlaid seals (i.e. comodo, remains in the same position at scroll) against layout-integrated seals which have fixed position
  • seals should be displayed site-wide (on all pages)
  • except for checkout pages, where you may have a different layout, keep the seal in the same spot for the whole website

Additionally:

  • a good place to test seals is near the logo (top left) or on the top right corner of the site
  • test the logo near the main Call-To-Action (CTA) button
  • display seals in the checkout process
  • at click on the seal, open the merchant site in a new window

Those are only some ideas, but you I am sure that you can think of your own tests. One thing in particular (never tested by me thou) is to test the effectiveness of a no-spam seal in email blasts :)

Here’s the collection listed in alphabetical order – click seals to enlarge – (back to top):

If I missed some, let me know. Enjoy testing!

Rate this Post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #29 – www.moneymanagement.org

January 7th, 2010

The first test of 2010 is on debt relief landing pages:

moneymanagement.org version A

moneymanagement.org version A

moneymanagement.org version B

moneymanagement.org version B

moneymanagement.org version C

moneymanagement.org version C

moneymanagement.org version D

moneymanagement.org version D

Rate this test!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #28 – www.birthdaydirect.com

December 31st, 2009

This test is different than the classic button test. Birthday Direct is testing the left navigation: single unit VS shorter, multiple units. Kudos to them! This is the kind of test you should run too!

birthdaydirect.com control version

birthdaydirect.com variation 1

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #27 – www.themagicoftesting.com

December 29th, 2009

The magic of testing dot com is testing:)

themagicoftesting.com control versionthemagicoftesting.com variation

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #26 – www.bettafishcenter.com

December 28th, 2009

Cute little fish, isn’t it? An A/B test from bettafishcenter.com:

bettafishcenter.com version A

bettafishcenter.com version B

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #25 – www.gather.com

December 26th, 2009
gather.com control

gather.com control

gather.com variation

1gather.com variation

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #24 – www.genbook.com

December 25th, 2009
genbook.com variation 1

genbook.com variation 1

genbook.com variation 2

genbook.com variation 2

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #23 – www.dummies.com

December 24th, 2009

Here’s a nice test from Dummies.com. Too bad the tested element is a bit below the fold, so many (around 40%) of the visitors will not see the test. I always suggest testing elements above the fold, no matter who will say that that fold doesn’t matter anymore.

Google browser size: more than 40% of visitors won's see the varied content

dummies.com control

dummies.com control version

dummies.com variation 1

dummies.com variation 1

dummies.com variation 2

dummies.com variation 2

Have a Merry, Merry Christmas!

Rate this Post!

GD Star Rating
loading...