Archive for the ‘Landing Page Optimization’ category

Google Does Mistakes Too

July 6th, 2010

So, Google does mistakes when it comes to SEO – you can read their score card here.

But they also have some usability/persuasion issues also, on their product details pages on Google Products. Look at the image below. What is  Not Specified supposed to mean? Size, shape, color or what?

Google Product Details - Conversion Barrier

Google Product Details - Conversion Barrier

You got to dig deeper, click link on Technical Specification, and have your brain do some workout to actually understand that Not Specified actually refers to the Service Provider:

Not Specified Means Service Provider Not Specified

Here’s a quick fix for them:

Quick Fix For Google Products (Detail Pages)

Quick Fix For Google Products (Detail Pages)

And another one:

another Quick Fix For Google Products (Detail Pages)

Another Quick Fix For The Same Problem

Rate This Post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

How Much Revenue Are You Losing with Non-Guest Checkouts – Part 2 of 3

April 26th, 2010

This is the second part of the series on the monetary valued of guest checkouts (read the first part here). For the next two parts of the article I will describe a couple of methods that can be used to derive the opportunity loss due to “locked checkouts” – a term I coined; sorry about that – , which are checkouts that require visitors to login or create accounts to finalize the purchase. The first method (which is to be preferred against the second) will generate accurate results and will be based on real numbers, while the second is more likely a forecasting method based on, well, approximations.

The approach described in this article is the only way to compute the exact monetary gains of the guest checkouts and it is actually a split test strategy. You will set up an A/B test, with a conservative split of the traffic, e.g. 90% of your visitors will see the original checkout process (the registration required version) and 10% of the visitors will go through a guest checkout. The conversion page will be the thank you page/receipt page. Keep in mind that to use this method you will need to be able to split the traffic, to two separate paths (URLs).

Let’s suppose this is the first page your visitors will see after clicking on the “Proceed to Checkout” button. This will be the original (A) for your test.

books a million non guest checkout

Booksamillion Checkout

For the variation page (B), you will have to rename the Create New Account to Guest Checkout.

books a million guest checkout

booksamillion Guest Checkout

During the next page(s) of the checkout don’t ask for a password or email ID until the end of the process, on the receipt/thank you page. On that page don’t forget to offer an incentive for users to sign up (10% off for the next purchase, personalized offers for members, etc.)

A very good example to follow is actionenvelope.com, on which you can buy as a guest and at the end of the purchase you can create an account:

action envelope thank you page

actionenvelope.com Thank You Page

Compare the conversions and the results by analyzing at the revenue generated by each of the two paths you’re testing! Be amazed!

That’s all folks! It’s not really that complicated, all you need is courage to do it, and some chips and soda for the IT guys :)

PS: Another useful metric to compare is the number of visitors you lose at the sign in page (create account VS proceed as a guest).

In the third part (and the last) of the article, I will describe how you could derive the opportunity loss for guest checkouts, without actually implementing a split test.

GD Star Rating
loading...

How Much Revenue Are You Losing with Non-Guest Checkouts – Part 1 of 3

March 24th, 2010

This article is about the optimization of what I consider to be one of the lowest hanging fruits for ecommerce websites, the checkout process. It can also relate to other types of web properties that require customers to pass through an online checkout process in order to purchase products or services.

Definitions: locked checkout is an online process that requires visitors to create an account in order to complete a purchase. Usually requires them to create provide a name and a password before the order is processed. A guest checkout is a checkout that leaves allows shoppers to buy products/services without asking them to create a username and a password.

The article is split in three parts. In the first part we will look at the psychological impact of the non-guest checkouts by utilizing an analogy of a brick and mortar shopping experience and a Sign In page for an online checkout. In the second and third part we look at the numbers needed to evaluate how much money you’re leaving on the table if you don’t offer a guest checkout option.

Part I: The psychological impact of a locked checkout

No matter how much effort you put into paid advertising or other traffic acquisitions strategy, there will be not much value if your website is not converting browsers into customers at an acceptable rate.

For the purpose of our article we’ll assume that you’ve spent resources to improve your landing pages. They are perfect: there’s no flaw between your keywords, ads and landing pages, your ad messages are in alignment with your visitors’ goals, your landing pages are matching their expectations and persona, and so on.

Your visitors are ready to buy from you and they click on the highly desired call to action button, the Add to Cart, and then they proceed to your Secure Checkout. On the first page of the checkout process, or the so called Sign In page, can visitors buy from your store without strings attached, more specifically, can they start the checkout process as guests?

If not, here’s how how a  similar “welcome” on the Sign In page could sound in a brick and mortar store:

If you like to buy something from us you first have to create an account – here’s a nice form for you to fill it out -, give us some private details such as your email address and your full name, tell us exactly where you live and share with us your credit card information. If you don’t want to do the aforementioned, sorry, we can’t sell you.

Would you buy from stores if they would ask you all of the above? I bet you wouldn’t. Similarly, that is what is going through the minds of your website’s visitors.

When we fill forms (online and offline) we are asked to share pieces of information such as names, addresses, phone numbers and even more sensitive ones like credit card details. Automatically, our brains will enter suspicious mode and will start asking questions such as why do you need my shipping address or why do you need my full name. Some of these questions will have obvious mental answers and will be answered in the unconscious mode. But other questions will trigged F.U.D’s (fears, uncertainties and doubts) which will be affecting goal completion rates and the overall website conversion rate.

Some visitors (and by some I mean lots of them) will ask themselves why are you requiring them to fill certain fields or why do you need them to complete some actions, i.e. why do I need to create an account to buy a product/service or Why do you need my email address to ship me something physical?

And when they start asking themselves, they start to leave/abandon the checkout process. And when they start leaving the checkout process, you start loosing money. How many? Stay tuned and I’ll show you two methods for calculating how much money you’re leaving on the table with locked checkouts.

Rate this post.

GD Star Rating
loading...

Avoid The Pitfalls of Computer Generated Heat Maps

January 22nd, 2010

I see a rising trend for computer generated heatmaps of websites, used for landing page optimization and conversion rate optimization. I am updating an older post regarding such tools.

If you’re using services like feng-gui or attention wizard you should be aware of the following:

  • computers are machines and even if they can detect skin, faces, smiles or eyes within pictures, they can’t create heatmaps for emotions associated with the image. Be honest, are you looking at the picture below exactly like computers do?! (scroll to see how a computer will look at Pamela Anderson).
pamela-anderson

Pamela Anderson

pamela anderson computer generated heatmap

Computer Generated Heatmap on Pamela Anderson

And here is how real people will look at the same image: (images and video courtesy of Peter Hartzbech from imotionsglobal.com):

Real Human Heatmap Gaze

Real Human Spotlight Fixation

Real Human Spotlight Gaze

Here’s the video:

  • human eyes (the direction they point at) and smiles (large, white teeth smiles) also play an important role on where your visitors will look at. An image depicting model’s eyes looking directly at the user will attract his eyes on the model’s eyes, while an image with the eyes of the “hero” pointing to a product (looking to the left or right) will “heat up” the product image. From GrokDotCom, here’s a real (made on humans) eye tracking heatmap:
bunnyfoot

Model looks at you (left) and at the product (right)

  • a website seen on a 1024×600 resolution will have a different heatmap compared with the same website seen on  1920 x 1200. What’s above the fold still matters, not matter what anyone will say. You need to analyze and optimize the website for most used resolution of your audience. Below are screenshots for the same website taken at different resolutions:
1024 heat map

The heatmap at 1024x768 res

Same website heatmap taken at 1920x1200.See the differences? Not sure if it's even technically correct

  • foveal and peripheral vision can also affects the eye movement and generate heat maps. The way you place elements on a page (headlines closers to an attractive image) will play a difference and I doubt current computer algorithms are taking this into consideration (via entrepreneur.com)
fovea-view

The hotspot seen by human eyes as per foveal view

  • banner blindness also has some influence (how would a computer know that an image is actually a banner and take banner (via useit.com)
banner blindness

Banner Blindness Eye Tracking Study

  • animation will change the hot spots

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Trust Seals Collection and How to Use Them to Increase Conversion Rates

January 14th, 2010


Trust seals is the generic phrase used to depict those images (see collection at the bottom of the article) which online businesses use on their websites to address Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUDs).

Seals can be categorized into privacy seals, business validity seals, PCI compliancy seals, hacksafe seals and other types. It may be useful to know that there are seals which are applicable to certain industries only (like the Pharmacy Checker for Canadian pharmacies) and seals which can be used on most of the websites (business verification seals).

Smart online marketers use seals on websites to transfer trust from a well-know company (i.e. Verisign) to visitors and to make them feel comfortable about their privacy, confidentiality or other concerns. In our terms, we use them to increase the conversion rate of websites.

Do they really have an effect on conversion rate? Yes, they do, but each seal will perform different, simply because your audience is different than the other website. While I do recommend using some of the seals, namely those which anyone will recognize, I advocate for multivariate testing. Most likely, if used correctly the impact on conversion rate should be either positive or neutral. If improperly used (clicking is not working, fake seal, etc) your conversion rate could suffer.

Having 20 trust seals on each page of your website will hurt. Having none, may hurt also. For site wide use, you should display 2 or 3 of them, which are important and recognized by  your audience. However, if you’re would like flex you muscles with 10 or more (which I don’t advise), I would recommend creating a dedicated page on your site, where you can lay all of them.

Here are some ideas when it comes to using and testing trust seals:

  • start testing with 2 or 3 seals: one wide known (i.e. McAfee) and your industry-specific seals
  • always display the seal above the fold; if your copy is way longer, repeat it near your call to actions
  • test overlaid seals (i.e. comodo, remains in the same position at scroll) against layout-integrated seals which have fixed position
  • seals should be displayed site-wide (on all pages)
  • except for checkout pages, where you may have a different layout, keep the seal in the same spot for the whole website

Additionally:

  • a good place to test seals is near the logo (top left) or on the top right corner of the site
  • test the logo near the main Call-To-Action (CTA) button
  • display seals in the checkout process
  • at click on the seal, open the merchant site in a new window

Those are only some ideas, but you I am sure that you can think of your own tests. One thing in particular (never tested by me thou) is to test the effectiveness of a no-spam seal in email blasts :)

Here’s the collection listed in alphabetical order – click seals to enlarge – (back to top):

If I missed some, let me know. Enjoy testing!

Rate this Post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #29 – www.moneymanagement.org

January 7th, 2010

The first test of 2010 is on debt relief landing pages:

moneymanagement.org version A

moneymanagement.org version A

moneymanagement.org version B

moneymanagement.org version B

moneymanagement.org version C

moneymanagement.org version C

moneymanagement.org version D

moneymanagement.org version D

Rate this test!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #28 – www.birthdaydirect.com

December 31st, 2009

This test is different than the classic button test. Birthday Direct is testing the left navigation: single unit VS shorter, multiple units. Kudos to them! This is the kind of test you should run too!

birthdaydirect.com control version

birthdaydirect.com variation 1

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #27 – www.themagicoftesting.com

December 29th, 2009

The magic of testing dot com is testing:)

themagicoftesting.com control versionthemagicoftesting.com variation

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #26 – www.bettafishcenter.com

December 28th, 2009

Cute little fish, isn’t it? An A/B test from bettafishcenter.com:

bettafishcenter.com version A

bettafishcenter.com version B

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...

Who’s Testing What #25 – www.gather.com

December 26th, 2009
gather.com control

gather.com control

gather.com variation

1gather.com variation

Rate this post!

GD Star Rating
loading...